← All sarcoma research
Review2022

Primary central nervous system sarcomas in adults: A systematic review.

Haider AS, Palmisciano P, Sagoo NS, Bin Alamer O, El Ahmadieh TY, Pan E, Garzon-Muvdi T · Clinical neurology and neurosurgery

Sarcoma subtypes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary central nervous system (CNS) sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of rare neoplasms with unclear etiology. Available data on clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and survival are scarce. We comprehensively reviewed management strategies and outcomes of primary CNS sarcomas in adults.

METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were search following the PRISMA guidelines to include studies on primary CNS sarcomas in adults. Clinical features, management strategies, and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS: We included 9 studies comprising 78 patients. Primary CNS sarcomas were mostly intracranial (87.2%), frequently located in the parietal (17.9%), frontal (14.1%), and temporal (14.1%) lobes. Spinal CNS sarcomas were found in 10 patients (12.8%). The most common tumor histology were fibrosarcoma (16.7%), intracranial synovial sarcoma (12.8%), extraosseous mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (11.5%), perivascular sarcoma (11.5%), reticulum cell sarcoma (11.5%), and myeloid sarcoma (9%). Partial resection (57.7%) was preferred over complete resection (42.3%), and 43 patients (55.1%) received adjuvant treatments: radiotherapy (51.3%) and/or systemic chemotherapy (20.5%). 21 patients experienced CNS sarcomas recurrences, with a median progression-free survival of 9 months (range, 4-48). At last follow-up, 60 patients (76.9%) were dead, with a median overall survival of 9 months (0.1-396). Overall survival was significantly longer in patients with fibrosarcoma (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION: Surgical resection coupled with adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation has historically been the cornerstone treatment for CNS sarcoma but showed poor local control and dismal survival. A better understanding of the CNS sarcoma microenvironment may favor the development of tailored strategies aimed at improving survival.

Shown exactly as published on PubMed. Your oncologist is the right person to judge whether these findings apply to your situation.

Publication type

Journal ArticleSystematic Review

Source: PubMed, PMID 35151057. Always confirm details with the original publication or your oncologist.